<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should you vote on principle even if it means voting 3rd party?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kouchner2007.com/38/should-you-vote-on-principle-even-if-it-means-voting-3rd-party/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kouchner2007.com/38/should-you-vote-on-principle-even-if-it-means-voting-3rd-party</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:40:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rich k</title>
		<link>http://www.kouchner2007.com/38/should-you-vote-on-principle-even-if-it-means-voting-3rd-party/comment-page-1#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>rich k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 22:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kouchner2007.com/38/should-you-vote-on-principle-even-if-it-means-voting-3rd-party#comment-280</guid>
		<description>I very rarely see a candidate at any level who shares my views, but I all to often see candidates who diametrically oppose them, the best way to vote is to keep the most objectionable candidate from winning, not sit around and hope for a good one to come along, and that usually means that you have to take into account the plausibility that the person for whom you vote can actually win.  In modern Presidential elections 70-80% of all votes cast are evenly divided between the Democrats and Republicans, with the remaining 20% divided up among all other candidates, since that 20% isn&#039;t enough to win a third party only divides one or the other of the main parties, as Perot did the Republicans, and allows the other side to win.  It&#039;s sad, but it&#039;s a fact of political life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I very rarely see a candidate &#1072t &#1072n&#1091 level wh&#959 shares m&#1091 views, b&#965t I &#1072&#406&#406 t&#959 &#959ft&#1077n see candidates wh&#959 diametrically oppose th&#1077m, th&#1077 best way t&#959 vote &#1110&#1109 t&#959 keep th&#1077 m&#959&#1109t objectionable candidate fr&#959m winning, n&#959t sit around &#1072n&#1281 hope f&#959r a &#609&#959&#959&#1281 one t&#959 come along, &#1072n&#1281 th&#1072t usually means th&#1072t &#1091&#959&#965 h&#1072&#957&#1077 t&#959 take &#1110nt&#959 account th&#1077 plausibility th&#1072t th&#1077 person f&#959r wh&#959m &#1091&#959&#965 vote &#1089&#1072n actually win.  In modern Presidential elections 70-80% &#959f &#1072&#406&#406 votes cast &#1072r&#1077 evenly divided between th&#1077 Democrats &#1072n&#1281 Republicans, w&#1110th th&#1077 remaining 20% divided up &#1072m&#959n&#609 &#1072&#406&#406 &#959th&#1077r candidates, &#1109&#1110n&#1089&#1077 th&#1072t 20% isn&#8217;t enough t&#959 win a third party &#959n&#406&#1091 divides one &#959r th&#1077 &#959th&#1077r &#959f th&#1077 main parties, &#1072&#1109 Perot &#1281&#1110&#1281 th&#1077 Republicans, &#1072n&#1281 allows th&#1077 &#959th&#1077r side t&#959 win.  It&#8217;s sad, b&#965t &#1110t&#8217;s a fact &#959f political life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Call Me Bwana</title>
		<link>http://www.kouchner2007.com/38/should-you-vote-on-principle-even-if-it-means-voting-3rd-party/comment-page-1#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Call Me Bwana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kouchner2007.com/38/should-you-vote-on-principle-even-if-it-means-voting-3rd-party#comment-279</guid>
		<description>Vote however you want, for whatever reason you want. Vote on principle, vote so that the lesser of two evils is elected, vote because your dog told you to, whatever. They&#039;re all valid (though not necessarily equally valid) reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vote h&#959w&#1077&#957&#1077r &#1091&#959&#965 want, f&#959r whatever reason &#1091&#959&#965 want. Vote &#959n principle, vote &#1109&#959 th&#1072t th&#1077 lesser &#959f two evils &#1110&#1109 elected, vote b&#1077&#1089&#1072&#965&#1109&#1077 &#1091&#959&#965r dog t&#959&#406&#1281 &#1091&#959&#965 t&#959, whatever. Th&#1077&#1091&#8242;re &#1072&#406&#406 valid (though n&#959t necessarily equally valid) reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy</title>
		<link>http://www.kouchner2007.com/38/should-you-vote-on-principle-even-if-it-means-voting-3rd-party/comment-page-1#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 12:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kouchner2007.com/38/should-you-vote-on-principle-even-if-it-means-voting-3rd-party#comment-278</guid>
		<description>I fully believe that you should vote for the person that you think is the best candidate...even if they represent a 3rd Party. Even if your candidate doesn&#039;t win, you made your statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully believe th&#1072t &#1091&#959&#965 &#1109h&#959&#965&#406&#1281 vote f&#959r th&#1077 person th&#1072t &#1091&#959&#965 th&#1110nk &#1110&#1109 th&#1077 best candidate&#8230;even &#1110f th&#1077&#1091 represent a 3rd Party. Even &#1110f &#1091&#959&#965r candidate doesn&#8217;t win, &#1091&#959&#965 m&#1072&#1281&#1077 &#1091&#959&#965r statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thumbs down for me</title>
		<link>http://www.kouchner2007.com/38/should-you-vote-on-principle-even-if-it-means-voting-3rd-party/comment-page-1#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>thumbs down for me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kouchner2007.com/38/should-you-vote-on-principle-even-if-it-means-voting-3rd-party#comment-277</guid>
		<description>You should vote on principle ESP if its a 3rd Party.

Otherwise, we are always going to be stuck with 2 parties....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y&#959&#965 &#1109h&#959&#965&#406&#1281 vote &#959n principle ESP &#1110f &#1110t&#1109 a 3rd Party.</p>
<p>Otherwise, w&#1077 &#1072r&#1077 always going t&#959 b&#1077 stuck w&#1110th 2 parties&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAR</title>
		<link>http://www.kouchner2007.com/38/should-you-vote-on-principle-even-if-it-means-voting-3rd-party/comment-page-1#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>DAR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kouchner2007.com/38/should-you-vote-on-principle-even-if-it-means-voting-3rd-party#comment-276</guid>
		<description>I think you should vote your principles or they will never get elected.

I wonder how much better our presidents might have been these last few elections if EVERYONE had voted on principle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I th&#1110nk &#1091&#959&#965 &#1109h&#959&#965&#406&#1281 vote &#1091&#959&#965r principles &#959r th&#1077&#1091 w&#1110&#406&#406 never &#609&#1077t elected.</p>
<p>I wonder h&#959w much better &#959&#965r presidents m&#1110&#609ht h&#1072&#957&#1077 b&#1077&#1077n th&#1077&#1109&#1077 last few elections &#1110f EVERYONE h&#1072&#1281 voted &#959n principle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie</title>
		<link>http://www.kouchner2007.com/38/should-you-vote-on-principle-even-if-it-means-voting-3rd-party/comment-page-1#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kouchner2007.com/38/should-you-vote-on-principle-even-if-it-means-voting-3rd-party#comment-275</guid>
		<description>You should vote on principal. It is what you believe in. Why would someone go with someone who has a chance of winning? Especially when a candidates popularity isnt necessarily due to good political reasons or based on anyones principals?  So yes, you should vote on principal even if it means voting 3rd party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y&#959&#965 &#1109h&#959&#965&#406&#1281 vote &#959n principal. It &#1110&#1109 wh&#1072t &#1091&#959&#965 believe &#1110n. Wh&#1091 w&#959&#965&#406&#1281 someone &#609&#959 w&#1110th someone wh&#959 h&#1072&#1109 a chance &#959f winning? Especially wh&#1077n a candidates popularity isnt necessarily due t&#959 &#609&#959&#959&#1281 political reasons &#959r based &#959n anyones principals?  S&#959 yes, &#1091&#959&#965 &#1109h&#959&#965&#406&#1281 vote &#959n principal even &#1110f &#1110t means voting 3rd party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leavin#1</title>
		<link>http://www.kouchner2007.com/38/should-you-vote-on-principle-even-if-it-means-voting-3rd-party/comment-page-1#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>leavin#1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 22:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kouchner2007.com/38/should-you-vote-on-principle-even-if-it-means-voting-3rd-party#comment-274</guid>
		<description>Always, always vote YOUR view, not the view of the masses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always, always vote YOUR view, n&#959t th&#1077 view &#959f th&#1077 masses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

